About normand94b187

How Does How Lesbian Content Differs From Heterosexual Content Work?

The article that first described ”Fistgate” to the world

Appeared in Massachusetts News, May 2000

The following content was written by Scott Whiteman and Brian Camenker immediately after the incident and WWW.FREELESBIANPASSPORT.COM was initially published in the May, 2000, issue of Massachusetts News. It led to national media coverage and two lawsuits.

CAUTION: THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS GROSS AND DISGUSTING DESCRIPTIONS. We reprint it here because it involved state employees and schoolchildren — and these actions are still being defended by the homosexual movement in Massachusetts.

Students Given Graphic Instruction In Homosexual Sex
By Brian Camenker and Scott Whiteman
Massachusetts News – May, 2000 edition

”Fisting [forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap….[It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you wat to be that close and intimate with…[and] to put you into an exploratory mode.”

The above quotation comes from Massachusetts Department of Education employees describing the pleasures of homosexual sex to a group of high school students at a state-sponsored workshop on March 25, 2000.

On March 25, a statewide conference, called ”Teach-Out,” was sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

Among the goals were to build more Gay/Straight Alliances in Massachusetts and expand homosexual teaching into the lower grades. Ratings of gay-friendly educators and administrators joined. They received state ”professional development credits.”

Teenagers and children as young as 12 were encouraged to come from around the state, and many had been bussed in from their home districts. Gay activists from across the nation have been as well there.

To say that the descriptions below of workshops and presentations of this state-sponsored event for educators and children are ”every parent’s nightmare,” does not do them justice. It is beyond belief that this could be happening at all. One music teacher who attended out of curiosity said that she could not sleep for several nights afterwards and had nightmares about it.

”Queer sex for youth, 14-21”

In one well-attended workshop, ”What They Didn’t Tell You About Queer Sex & Sexuality In Health Class: A Workshop For Youth Only, Ages 14-21,” the three homosexual presenters acting in their professional capacities coaxed about 20 children into talking openly and graphically about homosexual sex. The three presenters, illinoisforeclosurelist.com who described themselves as homogenderual, were:

– Margot E. Abels, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Education

– Julie Netherland, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Education

– Michael Gaucher, Consultant, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health

The workshop syllabus included:

– ”What’s it like to be young, commencing and queer to day?

– ”Are lesbians at risk for HIV?”

”We will address the information you want about queer sexuality and some of the politics that prevent us from getting our needs met.”

The workshop opened with the three public employees asking the children ”how they knew, as gay people, whether or not they’ve had sex.” Questions were thrown around the room about whether oral sex was ”sex,” to which the Department of Public Health employee stated, ”If that’s not sex, then the number of times I’ve had sex has dramatically decreased, from a mountain to a valley, baby.” the remedy offered itself Finally, and it had been determined that whenever an orifice has been filled with genitalia, sex had occurred then. The Department of Public Health employee, Michael Gaucher, had the following exchange with one student, who appeared to be about 16 years old:

Michael Gaucher: ”What orifices are we talking about?”
Student: [hesitation]
Michael Gaucher: ”Don’t be shy, honey; it can get done by you.”
Student: ”Your mouth.”
Michael Gaucher: ”Okay.”
Student: ”Your ass.”
Michael Gaucher: ”There you go.”
Student: ”Your pussy. That style or sort of spot.”

But since sex occurred ”when an orifice was filled,” the next question was how lesbians could ”have intercourse.” Margot Abels discussed whether a dildo had to be involved; when it was big or also little also; and what homosexual resources students could consult to get similar questions answered.

Role playing and ”carpet munching”

Then the children were asked to role-play. One student was to act the part of ”a young lesbian who’s really enraptured with another woman, and it’s really coming down to the wire and you’re thinking about having sex.” The other student played the ”hip GSA (gay, straight alliance) lesbian advisor, who you experience you can have a discussion to.” The ”counseling” included discussions of lesbian sex, oral-vaginal contact, or ”carpet munching,” as one student put it. At that real stage the period turned to another issue. The learning student asked whether it would smell like fish.

”A lesson in fisting?”

There was a five minute pause so that all of the teenagers could write down questions for the homosexual presenters. The first question seemed to be read by Julie Netherland, ”What’s fisting?”

A student answered this question by informing the class that ”fisting” is when you put your ”whole hand into the ass or pussy” of another. He informed the young young children that it seemed to be many easier. When a several of the understanding pupils winced, the Department of Public Health employee offered, ”A little known fact about fisting: you don’t make a fist like this. It’s like this.” He formed his hand into the shape of a tear drop rather than a balled fist.

Margot Abels told the students that ”fisting” is not about forcing your hand into somebody’s ”hole, opening or orifice” if they don’t want it there. She informed the course that it is a quite intense and emotional expertise. She said that ”usually” the person was very relaxed and opened him or herself up to the other.

At this point, a youngster of about 16 asked why someone would want to do that. He stated that if the hand were pulled out quickly, the whole thing didn’t sound very appealing to him. Margot Abels was quick to stage out that although fisting ”often gets a really bad rap,” it usually isn’t about the pain, ”not that we’re putting that down.” Margot Abels informed him and the class that ”fisting” was ”an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with.” When a good youthful kid questioned the issue, ”Why would someone do this?” Margot Abels given a comfy reaction to the youthful young children, in order to ”put them into an exploratory mode.”

”Rubbing each others’ clits…”

Michael Gaucher presented the next question, ”Do lesbians rub their clits together?”

Michael Gaucher and Margot Abels asked the kids if they thought it was possible and whether someone would do a ”hand-diagram” for the class. No one volunteered, but a girl who looked about 15 or 16 then stepped up to the board and drew a three foot high vagina and labeled each of the labia, the clitoris, and ”put up inside the ’G’-spot.” While drawing, Jordan Gaucher told her to use the ”pink” chalk, to which Margot Abels responded, ”Not everyone is pink, honey.” All of the young children chuckled.

After the chalk vagina was complete, the children remarked on the size of the ”clit,” and the presenters stated that that seemed to be a gifted woman. Margot Abels well informed all of the fresh females that Next, indeed, you can rub your ”clitori” together, either with or even without clothing and ”you might climax from it definitely.” Michael Gaucher told the kids that ”there is a name for this: tribadism,” which he wrote on the board and advised one girl who looked about 14 to ”bring that vocabulary word back to Bedford.” Julie Netherland informed the children that it wasn’t too difficult because, ”When you are sexually aroused, your clit gets bigger.”

”Should you spit after you suck another boy (or a man)?”

Michael Gaucher read the following from a card: ”Cum and calories: Spit versus swallow and the health concerns.” Gaucher informed the children that although he didn’t know the calorie count of male ejaculation, he has ”heard that it’s sweeter if people eat celery.” He expected the males subsequently, ”Is it rude not to consume?” Many of the high school boys mumbled ”No,” but one about the age of 16 said emphatically, ”Oh no!” One boy, again about the get older of 16, offered his advice on avoiding HIV/AIDS transmission while giving oral sex by not brushing your teeth or eating course food for four hours before you ”go down on a guy,” ”because then you probably don’t want to be swallowing cum.”

Another question asked was whether oral sex was better with tongue rings. A 16-year-old student murmured, ”Yes,” to which all of the youthful youngsters jeered. Michael Gaucher said, ”There you have it” and stated something to the effect that the debate has ended.

Use a condom? It’s your decision, really.
One usually hears that there will be an extreme HIV/Assists reduction advertising campaign, but the session ran 55 minutes before the first mention of ”protection” and safer sex came. In the context of the ”safer sex” discussion, however, it was pointed out that these children could make an ”informed decision” not to use a condom. Outside in the conference hall, the kids could effortlessly attain as several condoms, vaginal condoms and other contraceptive devices as they wished from various organizations which distribute such.

Well, yes…it is about gender really!

Another popular session was presented by the same three public employees in their professional capacity and has been called, ”Putting the ’Sex’ Back Into Sexual Orientation: Classroom Strategies for Health & Sexuality Educators.”
The workshop included:

What does it mean to say ”being gay, lesbian and bisexual isn’t about sex?…How can we deny that love-makinguality is central for all of us? How do we learn to address the unique concerns of queer youth?…This workshop is for educators to examine strategies for integrating sexuality HIV and education prevention content specific to gay, lesbian and bisexual students into the classroom and GSA’s….more strategies shall be discussed.”

The three presenters now assumed the task of teaching teachers how to facilitate discussions about ”queer sex” with their students.

Tired of denying it

Margot Abels opened by telling the room full of teachers (and two high school students), ”We always feel like we are fighting against people who deny publicly, who say privately, that being queer is not at all about sex… We otherwise believe. We think that making love is central to every single one of us and particularly queer youth.”

Margot Abels, Julie Netherland and Michael Gaucher reviewed a few ”campaigns” that have been used to demonstrate to queer youth how to best ”be safe” while still enjoying homosexual sex.

The campaign, ”Respect yourself, protect yourself,” was thought to be good in getting the message to kids that they should use protection, but since it made children who didn’t protect themselves feel bad, it inevitably had been a weak message. Michael Gaucher pointed out that children ”with an older partner that they are not feeling they can discuss things with, does that mean that they don’t respect themselves?”

The campaign, ”No sex, no nagging problem,” was ridiculed, as the strategy assumed that children could opt not to have sex. Additionally, the marketing campaign built those youngsters who experienced previously experienced intercourse come to feel awful or consider they possessed a difficulty, since they had acquired sex.

After reviewing a few of the campaigns, Margot Abels described the project she works on. These same presenters who just told a group of children how to properly position their hands for ”fisting” were now telling a room full of educators that they would visit their schools and conduct the same workshops for their students. The ”Gay/Straight Alliance HIV Education Project” goes to five different schools each year conducting up to eight ”HIV prevention sessions” in that school’s gay club.

An enormous amount of very disturbing material was distributed at the conference. There seemed to be a offer of condoms provided by both Sidney Planned and Borum Parenthood, all of which were for the taking. The Sidney Borum Community Health Center table was giving out a cassette sized ”pocket sex” kit, which included two condoms, two antiseptic ”moist” towelettes, and six bandages, which had been for ”when the sex got really rough,” according to the high school volunteer behind the desk. Much of it encourages young children to become engaged in homosexual actions actively. Children as young as 12 or 13 participating and receiving ”information” and materialss.

But most shocking of all was that there seemed to be an eerie sense of solidarity in the air, against ”those bigots who would stop our progress.”

The incident was dubbed ”Fistgate” by Masschusetts News publisher Ed Pawlick.

Soon afterward the above took place, the three state employees were fired by the Department of Education.

The homosexual movement responded by initiating a lawsuit against Brian Camenker, Scott Whiteman, and Parents Rights Coalition, saying that they got broken a great antiquated plus hidden Massachusetts wiretapping legislation in addition to looking for monetary damage. The ”Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders” (GLAD) — the same state-funded group that won the Goodridge same-sex ”marriage” case — went right into action.

A few months later, Margot Abels, one of the fired instructors, managed to get an arbitrator in the Mass. She didn’t take her job back, but rather started her very own litigation to pick up injuries. Dept. of Education to reinstate her job.

After a years of court activity the GLAD lawsuit ended in 2005, when Delighted fundamentally discontinued the condition. However, Margot Abels continued to pursue her personal injury lawsuit against Whiteman and Camenker. That suit was settled in 2006.